
In Bykovsky, a village of 457 on Russia's northeast coast, the shoreline is collapsing, creeping closer and closer to houses and tanks of heating oil, at a rate of 15 to 18 feet a year. Eventually, homes will be lost, and maybe all of Bykovsky, too, under ever-longer periods of assault by open water. "It is eating up the land," said Innokenty Koryakin, a member of the Evenk tribe and the captain of a fishing boat. "You cannot do anything about it."
To the east, Fyodor V. Sellyakhov scours a barren island with 16 hired men. Mammoths lived here tens of thousands of years ago, and their carcasses eventually sank deep into sediment that is now offering up a trove of tusks and bones nearly as valuable as elephant ivory.
Mr. Sellyakhov, a native Yakut, hauls the fossils to a warehouse here and sells them for $25 to $50 a pound. This summer he collected two tons, making him a wealthy man, for Tiksi. "The sea washes down the coast every year," he said. "It is practically all ice - permafrost - and it is thawing."
More Here
The thing is that we, like the woolly mammoths of old may not like the direction these changes are taking.
The benefits of climate change? A comparable case - though certainly less advantageous for the local population - is the city of Kivalina, AK. It turns out that Kivalina is eroding away as the sea rises around it's tiny 3.9 square mile area at the tip of of a long barrier island jutting out into the Chukchi Sea. Their response: Sue those most responsible for global warming. A recent blog post on Salon.com offers an interesting take on this case as it relates to the ongoing presidential election and the GOP vice presidential nominee.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.salon.com/tech/htww/2008/08/29/sarah_palin_and_climate_change/